|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 21-24
Graphene – Scope in conservative dentistry and endodontics
Priyankita Kar, Rana K Varghese, Naina Agrawal, Himanshi Solanki Jhaveri
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
|Date of Submission||01-Feb-2021|
|Date of Decision||16-Feb-2021|
|Date of Acceptance||01-Mar-2021|
|Date of Web Publication||24-Jun-2021|
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Sakri, Bilaspur - 495 001, Chhattisgarh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Graphene, a member of the carbon family, is the strongest, stiffest, and thinnest known material, with a thickness of 10 nm. It has emerged as engineered nanomaterials and nanomedicines in dentistry with promising results. Usually produced employing Hummers method, graphene possesses excellent physiomechanical properties, electrical conductivity, stability, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Owing to their interactions with dental pulp stem cells, they have been functionalized with many scaffolds in regenerative dentistry, to upregulate the odontogenic and osteogenic genes. This emerging science of graphene-based materials has also been used for the debridement of root canals. Their unique property of antibiofilm and antiadhesiveness has been used to prevent dental caries and erosions. In addition, they have been incorporated into various biomaterials to enhance their original properties, like in glass ionomers, biodentine, and in bleaching agents like hydrogen peroxide. Depending on their concentration and time of exposure to the substrate, graphene and their derivatives can be effective antibacterial agents. This updated review provides useful information on the promising introduction of graphene in the field of conservative dentistry and endodontics.
Keywords: Biomaterial, bleaching, carbon family, recent advances, tissue engineering
|How to cite this article:|
Kar P, Varghese RK, Agrawal N, Jhaveri HS. Graphene – Scope in conservative dentistry and endodontics. J Prim Care Dent Oral Health 2021;2:21-4
|How to cite this URL:|
Kar P, Varghese RK, Agrawal N, Jhaveri HS. Graphene – Scope in conservative dentistry and endodontics. J Prim Care Dent Oral Health [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 3];2:21-4. Available from: http://www.jpcdoh.org/text.asp?2021/2/2/21/319191
| Introduction|| |
Advancements in biomaterials and their growing clinical applications have recently led graphene to gain much attention. Graphene, a carbon allotrope, having two-dimensional, single, sheet-like, honeycomb pattern arrangement, has extremely high mechanical strength and young's modulus. Its use in dentistry is in accordance with its chemical, thermal, structural, and biological properties. Graphene nanomaterials comprise few-layer graphene, graphene nanosheets, graphene oxide (GO), and reduced GO. Among these, GO is the most important derivative of the graphene family, which is produced by the energetic oxidation of graphite employing the Hummers method. They contain numerous chemically reactive functional groups on its surface, facilitating their binding with materials such as biomolecules, DNA, proteins, and polymers. GO can be reduced chemically, electrochemically, and thermally to produce reduced GO. An advancing member of this graphene family is the fluorinated graphene, which has favorable biocompatibility along with exhibiting neuroinductive effect through spontaneous cell polarization. It also enhances the proliferation of mesenchymal cells to provide a scaffold for their growth. However, studies in dentistry are limited as compared to their research in the medical field.
| Brief History|| |
Hummers prepared graphite oxide in 1848, which was again introduced by Brodie et al. in 1958. In 1962, reduced GO was produced by reducing graphite oxide. Boehm et al. proposed the term graphene to illustrate and describe the single-layer structure of graphite-like carbon in 1986. Multiple layers were isolated by micromechanical exfoliation in 1999 by Rouff et al. and in 2004, Geim and Novoselov isolated single layer of graphene by mechanical exfoliation, for which they received a Nobel prize in 2010.
| Preparation of Graphene Oxide|| |
The physical properties of GO are different from pure graphene as most of the carbon atoms in the former are covalently connected to oxygen atoms. Usually, three methods are employed to prepare GO: Brodie's method, Staudenmaier's method, and Hummers' method. The method used for production determines the number and types of oxygen functional groups in the final product, which further determines their physical properties. The most common method adopted and reported in recent years is the Hummer's method.
Hummer's method requires 100 g of graphite, 50 g of sodium nitrate, and 2.3 L of sulfuric acid, to be stirred along with cooling. To this mixture, 300 g of potassium permanganate is slowly added, during which it is necessary to maintain the temperature below 20°C. Then, it is left to stand in a 35°C water bath for 30 min, following which 4.6 L of water is added. Now, it is heated in a 98°C water bath for 15 min and the mixture is diluted by adding water up to 14 L. To this mixture, hydrogen peroxide in a solution form is added until the bubbling stops. With the aid of filtration and washing, the impurities are removed.
| Biological Properties of Graphene|| |
Increasing popularity of graphene and their nanomaterials in dentistry have necessitated clinical and laboratory biocompatibility studies. Although in vivo studies are limited, it is almost certain that the hydrophilic forms are more biocompatible than the hydrophobic forms. Furthermore, reduced GO is less toxic than GO. In a study by Rosa et al., they concluded that the GO-based substrates when used, not only permitted the stem cell attachment and proliferation but also upregulated the mineral-producing cells. A biocompatibility study by Dreanca et al. evaluated the renal and hepatic toxicity and found no changes in the weights of organs and the tissue-specific enzymes remained within the normal limits of the species. They also prepared an experimental restorative material which presented with slight inflammatory response and some oxidative stress.
This property depends on the material's concentration, exposure time, and its physiochemical properties., Graphene nanocomposites demonstrate the excellent antibacterial activity by physically damaging the microorganisms by penetrating and breaking the cell membranes, along with wrapping the cells to induce mechanical stress and by extracting phospholipids from lipid membranes. It is also capable of producing oxidative stress. They also get inserted into bacterial membranes, breaking the Van der Waal's forces. The hydrophobic nature results in the extraction of phospholipids from the lipid layers of the bacterial membranes. These irreversible damages make graphene very effective antibacterial material.,,,, Beneficial, as it seems, this antibacterial is all relative and is questionable to be generalized.
The fate of graphene in vivo can be determined by how it is degraded. Several studies and investigations have concluded that neutrophils are capable of degrading highly dispersible graphene.
| Potential Uses of Graphene in Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics|| |
The exclusive properties of GO have inspired researchers to apply it in the prevention of dental caries and biofilm adhesion, along with its addition to materials such as glass ionomer cements, biodentine, and hydrogen peroxide, to enhance their properties. They have been tried and tested as an adjunct to chemical debridement of root canals and tissue engineering.
Although the latest advancements in glass ionomer cement constitute the incorporation of different fillers such as hydroxyapatite, metallic powders, and fibers, its poor physiomechanical properties continue to be a concern. Of late, attempts have been made to integrate graphene-derived nanomaterials into commercially available glass ionomer cements to enhance their reinforcement. The resultant product has significantly improved physical and mechanical properties than glass ionomers. The addition of fluoride graphene (FG) to glass ionomer could produce a GICs/FG composites matrix, that could augment the mechanical as well as antibacterial properties. This combination also decreases the pores and microcracks in the material's internal structure, along with increasing the antibacterial property, which makes it less susceptible to microbial invasion and erosion disintegration. Graphene nanoparticles can also improve the physiochemical properties of resin polymer matrices. Bregnocchi et al. proposed in their esteemed study, using graphene family nanoparticles with dental adhesives to provide antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties. Their study demonstrated that the experimental modified dental adhesive suggestively subdued the adhesion and growth of Streptococcus mutans. This was achieved without manipulating its original mechanical properties and without producing excess of reactive oxygen species.
Persistent infection is the chief cause of failure of endodontic therapy. Photodynamic therapy has lately gained importance for effectively disinfecting canals while preserving dentin structures. In this technique, a nontoxic photosensor, namely indocyanine green (ICG) plays a major role, but it has some drawbacks like its concentration-dependent aggregation and instability. By modifying ICG with GO, a significant reduction in the population of Enterococcus faecalis was observed, along with improvement in its bioavailability, stability, and prevention of degradation. A novel root canal irrigant which incorporates graphene into silver nanoparticles showed similar efficacy as 3% sodium hypochlorite solution and exhibited less cytotoxicity to the bone and soft tissues than the latter. Graphene nanosheets can also be added to some bioactive materials, like Biodentine and Endocem Zr, to decrease their setting times. Singh et al. developed a novel root canal obturating material made up of polymer nanocomposites incorporating GO and found that it had improved antimicrobial activity and mechanical properties than commercial Gutta Percha, and reportedly non-toxic to neighboring cells.
Rosa et al. were the first to confirm the ability of GO to allow dental pulp stem cells attachment and their proliferation in 2016. This was followed by Xie et al. who attempted to induce DPSC's osteogenic and odontogenic differentiation by GO produced by chemical vapor deposition. It downregulated the expression of odontoblastic genes such as Dentin Matrix Protein, Pax, and Msh homeobox 1, without any bioactive stimuli. This suggested that graphene grown using chemical vapor deposition may not be suitable as a platform for endodontics and pulp regeneration. On the other hand, osteogenic proteins, and genes such as osteocalcin, COL (collagen), and runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) were upregulated by graphene. Nonetheless, it could be a potential biomaterial for osseous engineering and regeneration, while presenting to be the most promising biocompatible scaffolds for mesenchymal stem cell's adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation.,
In a recent study by Jae Ahn et al., synthesized mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticle (MBN) composite with GO to study the ability to mineralize and the differentiation potential of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). Their results showed enhanced effects on the mRNA and protein expression of odontogenic differentiation markers in hDPSCs and even promoted the mineralization which is deemed to be an essential step for regeneration of dentin. They concluded that this MBN/GO composite can therefore be used in dentin-pulp complex tissue engineering. Ahmad Gholami et al. synthesized chitosan functionalized GO and carboxylated graphene and found that the latter was safer with higher cytocompatibility when exposed to hDPSCs. Negar Mansouri et al. fabricated GO/sodium alginate (GOSA) and reduced GOSA scaffolds, which proved to have controlled biodegradability and surface cell adhesion, thus aiding in the superior proliferative ability of hDPSCs.
Graphene, when paired with appropriate materials, has proved to improve teeth whitening. A nanocomposite was developed employing reduced GO and cobalt tetraphenylporphyrin to be used as a catalyst for bleaching of teeth. This compound when used with hydrogen peroxide using standard photoactivation, increased the bleaching effect of the latter, along with reducing the treatment time. It was seen that when both the components were photoactivated together, it created more chemical reactions between the stain molecules on teeth and hydrogen peroxide.
GO incorporated in titanium implants has proved to be a promising drug delivery method in biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. This property can be utilized in endodontics for intracanal medicament as nanosheet structures, with high surface area and good water dispersibility. However, studies on drug delivery in dentistry are limited.
| Challenges|| |
Despite abundant studies on graphene and its derivatives, it is at an early stage of research and development, calling for some significant challenges to be addressed. A key challenge is its long-term biocompatibility issues in the clinical scenario., In a recent study, it was reported that graphene's purity should be taken into consideration during biofunctionalization procedures as graphene-based materials might produce oxidative debris, which may lead to cytotoxicity. Before the commercialization of graphene-based materials, toxicity profiles, biodegradability, and biocompatibility must be considered at large, with parallel considerations into cost-effectiveness and production reliability.
| Conclusion|| |
Graphene and its derivatives have been applied in all fields of medicine; however, in dentistry, they have been a few steps back. Graphene, the strongest, stiffest, and thinnest imaginable material, provides unique properties such as superior physiomechanical properties, large surface area, and their ability to amalgamate with different substances, to augment their properties. This carbon-derivative material can be used to fabricate biocomposites and to enhance the bioactivity of the existing biomaterials, providing progressive and promising dimensions in the field of dentistry in the days to come.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Chatterjee N, Eom HJ, Choi J. A systems toxicology approach to the surface functionality control of graphene-cell interactions. Biomaterials 2014;35:1109-27.
Wang H, Gu W, Xiao N, Ye L, Xu Q. Chlorotoxin-conjugated graphene oxide for targeted delivery of an anticancer drug. Int J Nanomedicine 2014;9:1433-42.
Gadgil B, Damlin P, Kvarnstrom C. Graphene vs. reduced graphene oxide: A comparative study of graphene based nanoplatforms on electrochromic switching kinetics. Carbon 2016;96:377-81.
Brodie BC. On the atomic weight of graphite. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 1859;149:249-59.
Staudenmaier L. Method for the representation of graphite acid. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 1898;32:1481-99.
Hummers WS Jr., Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 1958;80:1339.
Guazzo R, Gardin C, Bellin G, Sbricoli L, Ferroni L, Ludovichetti FS, et al
. Graphene-based nanomaterials for tissue engineering in the dental field. Nanomaterials 2018;8:349.
Rosa V, Xie H, Dubey N, Madanagopal TT, Rajan SS, Morin JL, et al
. Graphene oxide-based substrate: Physical and surface characterization, cytocompatibility and differentiation potential of dental pulp stem cells. Dent Mater 2016;32:1019-25.
Dreanca A, Sarosi C, Parvu AE, Blidaru M, Enacrachi G, Purdoiu R, et al
. Systemic and local biocompatibility assessment of graphene composite dental materials in experimental mandibular bone defect. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:2511.
Liu S, Zeng TH, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R, et al
. Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: Membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 2011;5:6971-80.
Hu W, Peng C, Luo W, Lv M, Li X, Li D, et al
. Graphene-based antibacterial paper. ACS Nano 2010;4:4317-23.
Pham VT, Truong VK, Quinn MD, Notley SM, Guo Y, Baulin VA, et al
. Graphene induces formation of pores that kill spherical and rod-shaped bacteria. ACS Nano 2015;9:8458-67.
Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Esfandiar A. Wrapping bacteria by graphene nanosheets for isolation from environment, reactivation by sonication, and inactivation by near-infrared irradiation. J Phys Chem B 2011;115:6279-88.
Zhou R, Gao H. Cytotoxicity of graphene: Recent advances and future perspective. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2014;6:452-74.
Al-Jumaili A, Alancherry S, Bazaka K, Jacob MV. Review on the antimicrobial properties of carbon nanostructures. Materials (Basel) 2017;10:1066.
Li J, Wang G, Zhu H, Zhang M, Zheng X, Di Z, et al
. Antibacterial activity of large-area monolayer graphene film manipulated by charge transfer. Sci Rep 2014;4:4359.
Chrepa V, Kotsakis GA, Pagonis TC, Hargreaves KM. The effect of photodynamic therapy in root canal disinfection: A systematic review. J Endod 2014;40:891-8.
Akbari T, Pourhajibagher M, Hosseini F, Chiniforush N, Gholibegloo E, Khoobi M, et al
. The effect of indocyanine green loaded on a novel nano-graphene oxide for high performance of photodynamic therapy against Enterococcus faecalis
. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2017;20:148-53.
Sharma DK, Bhat M, Kumar V, Mazumder D, Singh SV, Bansal M. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of graphene silver composite nanoparticles against e. faecalis
as root canal irrigant: An ex vivo
study. Int J Pharm Med Res 2015;3:267-72
Dubey N, Rajan SS, Bello YD, Min KS, Rosa V. Graphene nanosheets to improve physico-mechanical properties of bioactive calcium silicate cements. Materials 2017;10:606.
Singh AA, Makade CS, Krupadam RJ. Graphene nanoplatelets embedded polymer: An efficient endodontic material for root canal therapy. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2021;121:111864.
Bansode PV, Pathak SD, Wavdhane MB, Hajong R. GRAPHENE: A future promising biomaterial in endodontics and restorative dentistry: A review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 2020;19:21-4.
Ahn JH, Kim IR, Kim Y, Kim DH, Park SB, Park BS, et al
. The effect of mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles/graphene oxide composites on the differentiation and mineralization of human dental pulp stem cells. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2020;10:620.
Gholami A, Emadi F, Amini A, Shokripour M, Chashmpoosh M, Omidifar N. Functionalization of graphene oxide nanosheets can reduce their cytotoxicity to dental pulp stem cells. J Nanomater 2020;2020:14.
Mansouri N, Al-Sarawi S, Losic D, Mazumdar J, Clark J, Gronthos S, et al.
Biodegradable and biocompatible graphene-based scaffolds for functional neural tissue engineering: A strategy approach using dental pulp stem cells and biomaterials. Authorea Prepr 2021. [Preprint].
Su IH, Lee CF, Su YP, Wang LH. Evaluating a cobalt-tetraphenylporphyrin complex, functionalized with a reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite, for improved tooth whitening. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28:321-9.
Nizami MZ, Takashiba S, Nishina Y. Graphene oxide: A new direction in dentistry. Appl Mater Today 2020;19:100576.
Yang K, Li Y, Tan X, Peng R, Liu Z. Behavior and toxicity of graphene and its functionalized derivatives in biological systems. Small 2013;9:1492-503.
Banerjee AN. Graphene and its derivatives as biomedical materials: Future prospects and challenges. Interface Focus 2018;8:20170056.